Hacker News Reader

Model Welfare? Are they serious about this? Or is it just more hype? I really don't trust anything this company says anymore. "We have a model that is too dangerous to release" is like me saying that I have a billion dollars in gold that nobody is allowed to see but I expect to be able to borrow against it.

View on HN

Maybe referring to it as welfare is odd, but these points are important. It isn't a good look to have a model that tends to get into self-deprecating loops like one of Google's older models, it's an even worse look and potential legal liability if your model becomes associated with a suicide. An overly negative chat model would also just be unpleasant to use.

With the weights being mostly opaque, these kinds of evaluations are an important piece of reducing the harm an AI model can cause.

I feel that anthropomorphizing the model is also potentially very harmful. We've seen that in the LLM interactions that end in tragedy. It's the wording that bothers me.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com