Hacker News Reader

By image generation standards this is a ridiculously good result. No surprise that people instantly find the new limits, but they are new limits.

It could already copy the art styles from its training data, what is the advancement here?

But it's also straight up plagiarism and still ridiculously bad on so many levels.

It's interesting that the raccoon is well defined because it was a part of the request. But none of the other Fauna are.

it's interesting, zoomed out it kind of looks ok, zoomed in.... oh my.