Hacker News Reader

How are these for reputable sources?

The United Nations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resoluti...

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_territories

US State Dept: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2002/18278.htm

Israeli soldiers: http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/

>1. wikipedia =/= reputable 2. Look at the contents of all those "resolutions" and you come to realize that none of them stand or are unbiased. 2a. A lot of those Resolutions are contradictory and self referential. anything else?

Yes, the UN is "biased" and "does not stand", Wikipedia is not "reputable". Conveniently sidestepping the US State Dept and Israeli soldiers accounts too.

May I suggest that it's not the UN who is "biased" but you?

1. wikipedia =/= reputable 2. Look at the contents of all those "resolutions" and you come to realize that none of them stand or are unbiased. 2a. A lot of those Resolutions are contradictory and self referential. anything else?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com