"Economy should improve allocation of resources universally, instead of allowing a handful to hold what many are lacking."
And so on...
Society has advanced in technology but didn't progress the same way in philosophy.
"Economy should improve allocation of resources universally, instead of allowing a handful to hold what many are lacking."
And so on...
Society has advanced in technology but didn't progress the same way in philosophy.
I 100% take your point here, but it's worth saying the modern economy has improved resource access in a lot of ways. It's also worth saying that wealth distribution looks very different between countries[0].
None of this goes against what you've said really, but I think it's important to point out that there our multiple societies, with different values. We can shape and change the ones we're in.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_we...
We live in a time with an extremely low murder rate (historically speaking), a very high literacy rate, the ability to keep in touch with family members across the world extremely cheaply, eradication or near-eradication of lots of diseases. If I were to extrapolate that outward then I could do the same kind of logic to talk about how great everything is.
I guess I just find this kind of doomerism to be extremely tempting but ultimately just reductive.