What if it only drives along select predetermined monetised routes?
What if it only drives along select predetermined monetised routes?
I don’t see the value in hypotheticals like that. If the claim is that a computer is not really a computer unless every user can do any low level operations they want, is it also true that a car is not really a car unless every user can do any low level operations they want?
Our argument shouldn't be about the device's capabilities, but about its ownership. And increasingly, as this enshittification progresses, the person buying the device is becoming less and less its owner.
You could own a race car that cannot legally be driven on any public roads and it’s still a car.
I agree with brookst that this sort of redefinition is a poor rhetorical tool.
This isn’t relevant. Taxis are still cars and that’s something the vast majority of people would agree with. The fact that they have a more specific name doesn’t change anything.
A Bungalow is still a house. A skyscraper is still a building. A panini is still a sandwich. A taxi is still a car.