Let's say the IRGC, Mossad or NSA is behind that developer of the Notepad++ on Mac clone and would love to piggyback on your trademark name in order to push a spyware infected app on to some targets. You don't know them and can't trust them so you don't want them using your name because that would backfire on you.
There's plenty of precedent with this in browser extensions, where once they become super popular they end up being sold and bought by some shady Israeli PE or ad-tech company with ties to Mossad. You don't want your name or trademark anywhere near this, if you value it, so you'll have to call out and ban everyone who tries to use it without your explicit permission.
This isn't the developer trying to be a dick to other developers, this is the developer exercising common sense and self preservation.
Of course I'd prefer for Don Ho to voice his political opinions through more appropriate channels, but it is what it is.
I would argue that we don't see enough open source developers presenting their political or social views in the context of their works.
The appropriate channel for other people to voice their politics is anywhere else, so that ASalazarMX doesn't have interact with it and gets to pretend everything's okay.
The appropriate channel for voicing politics and ideology would be my personal accounts, not a software utility. Would you enjoy if your generous neighbor offered to mow your lawn for free, but left political messages on it?
I've rarely contributed to, or released something open source, but I know it's unprofessional to mix personal and work subjects, and open source is work, even if you do it for free.
And to counter the visibility argument, I followed Don Ho on Twitter, now on BlueSky, and actually enjoy his publications even when they aren't strictly work related.