Hacker News Reader

I'm not sure, but my understanding is that GitHub historically focused more on open source, with PRs being mainly across repos of unrelated users, such that there's more of a distance to "pull" across, while Gitlab was always mainly targeting companies, where people typically use branches in the same repo, so it's just a nearby merge.

In other words, I see a pull request in an open source project to be just "I have something nice in my fork, do you think it'll be useful upstream?", which is acceptable to reject, whereas in a team setting it's "I have a feature that I think is ready to merge - give it a look and see if I missed something before we put it in".

This is really helpful framing. Thanks!

I could never absorb “pull request”. People talking about PRs clink against my brain. Merge request makes far more sense to me.

From a semantics perspective, MR makes more sense as it's a request to merge a branch into another. PR is weird IMO, but I think really just caught on due to GitHub's popularity.