I don't think it does.
udev also now requires systemd, which means, you have no choice, but to use systemd.
systemd also brings it's own dependencies.
But that's just conveniently omitted from such explanation posts.
systemd also brings it's own dependencies.
But that's just conveniently omitted from such explanation posts.
This was silly and even though a patch was created specifically to address this, it was nak'd by the systemd developers.
Disclaimer: I've been a Gentoo developer for about 7 years now. I'm not directly working on the fork but I am testing and throwing in suggestions for using it on ARM devices where it doesn't make sense to have everything systemd provides, but the devices are more powerful and busybox's mdev is underkill.
So patch the Makefile.in. Maintaining one patch requires a fork?
I am testing and throwing in suggestions for using it on ARM devices where it doesn't make sense to have everything systemd provides, but the devices are more powerful and busybox's mdev is underkill.
Yep, when I use an embedded ARM device, I definitely want a sluggish sysV init boot process. And a crusty old standalone udev with brittle hacks to handle sleep, suspend, and other power-related state transitions.
Because, you know, it's not x86.
No, it doesn't: make systemd-udevd