There's a strong case that they didn't even defeat the nazis, that was done by the Soviets.
There's a strong case that they didn't even defeat the nazis, that was done by the Soviets.
The Soviet Union defeated the Nazis with US materiel. Without that, they probably don't get it done.
And even if what you said were true, the US still should have supported Ukraine more than it did, and should do so now.
The US can't subdue Iran, leave alone Russia. Or China.
But the original question was whether the US should be supporting Ukraine. You keep wanting to make this about the US going head-to-head against Russia or China, but that's not actually the subject under discussion here.
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/us-loses-51st-mq9-...
This isn't about the US against Russia/China. This is about the US and its vassals against the civilised world.
With Lend-Lease equipment. No matter what way you cut it, multiple nations defeated the Nazis together.
By the time the western allies reached Berlin the Soviets had already wrecked the Germans.
No one is arguing the US fought on the eastern front, the argument is over who suffered the most.
Don't take my word for it, read "When Titans Clashed" by Glantz and House.
The US and their vassals merely made you believe their propaganda: Patton the movie et al.
Are you British? They play word games.