That's because most of the LLM output is associated with low effort spam, and they are not wrong. You keep fighting for LLM rights, lol.
See the problem?
The comment you responded to did not have those.
Fwiw, the article we're commenting on was likely not LLM written. The sentence structure is too convoluted, no LLM would've generated it like that - unless very carefully prompted ... But at that point it's no longer pure AI slop (imo).