> AI is only as good as the person using it, that's why we have such vast range of what people "claim" AI can do and why everyone has way different opinions of it.
Banger statement.
Banger statement.
> Banger statement.
True, but it's even a bit more removed than that.
For a version 0.9 prototype, AI can produce pretty awesome-feeling output even in the hands of the most incompetent. So it looks like a miracle that does it all, with zero effort.
It's later down the road that it starts hitting walls that need a competent architect in charge.
What is terrifying is that those that claim 100x increased productivity are those with the least wisdom to tell good code from bad. They are the ones inundating the world with utter slop.