As Data Collecting Grows, Privacy Erodes
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
That's troubling even for someone who is not an A-list celebrity like A-Rod.
Until we have mandatory legislated tracking devices in cars, etc. (not a far-fetched idea at all, and something that must be fought), you are largely the keeper of your own privacy.
And it's getting significantly harder to avoid these kinds of surveillance. You forgot to mention: never have a utility bill, or a mortgage, or a car...
"Do it yourself" is no longer an effective option.
I'm aware of k-anonymization, where you change the data to make it mathematically impossible to identify an individual data point more specifically than among k entries. So for example
Age Weight Disease
18 150 Cancer
45 203 Diabetes
37 197 Heart Disease
becomes Age Weight Disease
* * Cancer
[36-45] [195-210] Diabetes
[36-45] [195-210] Heart Disease
for k=2, and it's now impossible to know for sure the disease of the 45-year-old, whereas you could deduce that information from the earlier records.Another approach, used by some major search engines for ad-targeting, is to insert random noise into the data.
What other solutions are there? If you build software that captures sensitive data, how do you deal with it?
It's when you start compiling knowledge (I almost want to say "evidence") from multiple data sets that privacy is really invaded. Couple your anonymous dataset with the search histories of the people involved, and you'll likely get your answer.
Or couple it to their travel info to see which hospital are they likely to have visited so regularly - does the hospital have a specialist diabetes or heart disease unit?