This assumes surveillance prevents crime, or even that crime is worth preventing if surveillance is the cost.
In terms of everyday threats to my life, billionaires are a bigger one than criminals.
In terms of everyday threats to my life, billionaires are a bigger one than criminals.
The cost is manageable as long as it's used for the right reasons and that the data is kept secure. The benefits of deterring violence outweigh those risks.
Billionaires may be a bigger threat but criminals are a threat nonetheless.
Two things that we have yet to be able to even reasonably ensure.