But do you think they push random divisive issues, unrelated to their own interests, just to destabilize countries they don't like? I think the evidence for that is much weaker.
There's no doubt in my mind that there's a constant effort to keep it that way.
There's entire apps designed to organize brigading efforts online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/01/24/gaza-is...
Soft power operations are hard to measure. You cannot measure the impact of Israeli activities either.
VKomtakte social network was blocked because owners were russian, and there could interfere in internal affairs.
Why not block facebook? Its ownership has clear ties to Israel and it DOES interfere in elections and democratic process!
I see you've never heard of Hasbara.
Anyway, there's little reason to think that influence scales with the size of the population as opposed to the number of people involved in active influence and funding, especially with Russia locking down access to the global internet. Israel simply has much, much, much, much more to gain from interfering in american culture than russia does (despite its being scapegoated by the least capable of our politicians).