> You just reveal your own ignorance by equivocating value with monetary value.
When did I do that? (Assuming by equivocating, you meant equating.)
When did I do that? (Assuming by equivocating, you meant equating.)
> But in both cases the value only existed because of the people offering the deal. XeroX doing nothing with a UI or native Americans doing nothing with some land would mean the UI and the land would continue to be worth nothing. It was the others coming with ideas and effort that made them valuable.
Specifically, "XeroX doing nothing with a UI or native Americans doing nothing with some land would mean the UI and the land would continue to be worth nothing" is what I am getting at.