Hacker News Reader

Comment by internet2000 | Hacker News Reader

internet2000

Hope this forces Anthropic to be less stingy with Fable.

Not including their best model in a max subscription would otherwise be truly a good reason for once to consider going back to openai for me. I'll at least try it.

At least Anthropic have a max subscription for corporate. Codex is only pay-as-you-go pricing beyond the base plan. Hence I'm stuck with Opus for work for the foreseeable future.

> Codex is only pay-as-you-go pricing beyond the base plan

I don't think so, I'm on a ~$200 subscription (guessing that counts as way beyond "base plan") and have no pay-as-you-go pricing at all, using the OpenAI APIs would be way too expensive for me.

For corporate *

You can't use sub pricing with orgs w/ OpenAI.

Apparently not? At least our it guy said after 150 people or so you have to pay for enterprise which is pay per token for everyone.

This is referring to the Business plan I think (used to be called Teams or something). The problem is that there are two types of seats: normal and codex only.

Codex only gets billed at API prices. The normal seats are more like a normal subscription, but their codex limits were LESS than a $20 subscription last time I checked (it used to be the same or more but they reduced it when they introduced the codex only seats).

im talking about anthropics pricing

Yeah. I'll switch to OpenAI if they release Sol on their subscription tiers.

Hopefully they aren't, and their business dies. They're not a good company.

If Altman wasn't such a liar anthropic wouldn't exist.

It is not because they want to but because they literally don't have the capacity to.

I thought that was solved after the SpaceX deal? Claude is rarely down since that and they have a 1.5x usage promo until 13th July.

It's a bandaid not a full solution.

Why haven’t we seen any queues or the like over the past week then? If it’s truly a capacity limitation why not just boot subscription users to a lower priority queue or limit usage to outside peak hours?

There could be a whole host of reasons. It may be during launch that compute is re-allocated from training to inference so that all users can try Fable. Soon that compute will re-allocate back to training until they can get more compute.

They are, that's why Fable is going away tomorrow for example.

What a suprise, to make better models, they just making them larger and larger, then they can barely run it, after a round of LARP-ing that they invented some dangerous LLM?

Yes, that's how you get to the quality of Fable versus worse models these days.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com