If Terraform is so great, why isn't anyone using it anymore?

Feels like a shill article for Pulumni.

I am not bashing Pulumni, or glorifying Terraform, but the examples shown in the article are simple, and do not proof any of the mentioned advantages.

It's pretty much ubiquitous to me.

And, BTW, I usually joke Terraform had bugs before the first line of code was written. What's even the point of caching a state if the state can be changed behind Terraform's back.

"You can absolutely write bad Pulumi code. You can over-engineer it. You can create abstractions nobody understands. You can make something simple feel clever for no reason.

But that is not a Pulumi problem.

That is a software design problem."

An uncomfortable idea is that these are basically the same thing. There's a reason the phrase "just enough rope to hang yourself" exists. A system that requires more software design <can be> a problem in and of itself.

Terraform was always been trash. It lacked functionality it said it had on the tin. Hashicorp was good at marketing

Seemed like trash when I used it