Hacker News Reader

Comment by deno | Hacker News Reader

This likely comes down to how it accessed the bus schedules (i.e. web search tool) and not intelligence.

You need to add the actual bus schedule to context somehow (research agent, custom tool or just dump in prompt) and even the simpler modern models will be able to do the planning.

View on HN

Tool usage competency is part of overall intelligence. If the model can't get the information it needs, it must clarify that in the response.

This isn't tool usage competency, it's tool quality and/or luck. Regular web search is not good for grounding if you want accurate results. You can ask the model to make a tool for getting bus schedules and then use it only then you are comparing apples to apples in this case.

If the model can't get the information it needs to accurately answer the question, it must surface that risk to you instead of guessing. This is part of model intelligence and tool use competency. Fable and to a lesser extent Opus is very good at this

This would be hallucination rate and neither of those models excels in this area and in fact Grok does, or at least prior version.

It's both. Some models, given web search and web fetch may only run a search and assume the summary text is correct and blindly return it. Others will validate by running a web fetch and checking the whole page contents. Even better, the model will run multiple searches and fetches to cross check the information. The best models will attempt to verify whether a source is authoritative or not and try to only return authoritative results.

I have an example here: https://gist.github.com/nijave/2873b8b10d8c732e46264237b0755...

Tldr; all the Claude models had identical tools and some used them efficiently and verified data while others did a crap job and hallucinated responses. Additionally, Exa MCP tools generally worked better even on older/smaller model (Llama)

Unless I'm missing something I think to a large degree you're just comparing system prompts.

If I add "Research the question extensively" to your prompt at the end I get the correct answer from Haiku and Sonnet Med on first try and I've reproduced the original prompt not returning the answer.

Unfortunately every other run now gets your gist in results.

It could be variations in system prompt but I'm not sure how "change the user prompt to encourage tool usage" proves that either way

The point of this was supposed to be "model tool use competency" not baseline over-eagerness.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com