Hacker News Reader

Comment by inigyou | Hacker News Reader

There were many smartphones before both iOS and Android.

While that may be technically true for a strict definition of “smartphone,” there’s no denying the iPhone redefined the concept in a way that its competitors were forced to copy to have any hope of keeping up. Nobody hears the word “smartphone” and thinks of a Blueberry or Treo anymore.

What exactly did the iPhone do better?

That's a subjective question, so I'll give a subjective answer. The browser, for better or worse, was a lot less dumbed down for mobile than competitors, the stylus-less touch interface reduced UI friction and the odds that you'd lose a critical (if inexpensive) component, and the slew of contemporary iPod users could easily migrate their libraries over.

Perfected multi-touch touchscreen

Before that we had touchscreen but they sucked.

---

    2002: FingerWorks makes advances in multi-touch technology
    2005: Apple acquires FingerWorks and its patents
    2007: iPhone launches

I really don't think multitouch is what made or broke the original iPhone.

It preceded its release with the iPod craze, making it a lifestyle product rather than something marketed for its capabilities (which were very humble compared to other contemporary devices and only started to catch up in second gen).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com