Hacker News Reader

nobody writes like that. the article is based on a prompt, which i would much rather read, instead of the ironed out version that the llm produced

View on HN

fine, i agree that this doesnt sound like me. But the content is correct and not a hallucination!

so did you write this post with the assistance of LLMs?

Could you annoy someone else please.

> the article is based on a prompt, which i would much rather read

I would much rather read someone's carefully written and LLM-assissted article than shallow and lazy dismissals like this one. What, precisely, do you feel you've added to the conversation here?

Why not publish the prompt anyway and let readers decide if they want to run it through an LLM (maybe next year's LLM, which will probably be better)?

What do you think this magical prompt will be, exactly, that perfectly represents what was almost certainly an iterative rather than spot process on the author's part?

also slightly disrespectful to think that this was a single prompt, but ok:D

Exactly that

Reply on news.ycombinator.com