And with investment newsletters, you buy stock based on information that they sell you, but it's your choice right? Would you really be in violation of their terms?
And with investment newsletters, you buy stock based on information that they sell you, but it's your choice right? Would you really be in violation of their terms?
In other words, if you in any way say "I think you should buy this", you raw afoul of the SEC, but just saying "I just bought this, and I think it's a good idea" you probably don't.
Now, would a service like that describe need SEC certification? Would the individual contributors? It can be constructed in a way that wouldn't, but that's far from trivial to either build it that way, or to even be convinced that it is for a contributor.
and re:"the violations of their terms", I meant their copyrights and the TOS you sign on. If I re-publish it (even if it's just by showing the whole world what I did), I might. It's not enforceable, but probably legal, and many such publications assert that you are not allowed to redistribute their advice in any form.
I guess the only other thing I would worry about would be ending up trying to learn from someone who has as little experience as I do.