Not rich enough compared to the individual productivity gains.
Don't tell me you have been fooled by the Chicago school of economics that has told you that relative wealth is indifferent as long as you can get a cheaper television.
Don't tell me you have been fooled by the Chicago school of economics that has told you that relative wealth is indifferent as long as you can get a cheaper television.
If you think about it, it is clear that what you propose is not sustainable as there is a forced constant push on the spending distribution.
It will fail.
For what exactly, for growth? https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BTgXU8... here
> large growth but largest in top decile vs no growth, the first one is absolutely 1000x times better