Hacker News Reader

Haven't used IDA much lately, but after looking at the screenshot with that IDA PRO decompiled code in their website I feel like Ghidra is already ahead of them in this area :D

View on HN

Interesting. A lot of data shows IDA Pro is significantly better than Ghidra: https://decbench.com/

Based on today's results, IDA Pro is ahead by 15 percentage points, which would mean, statistically, IDA Pro will recover perfect source code for 15% more functions than Ghidra on average.

I have seen some code where either Ghidra or IDA is producing the better output. It's not cut and dry, but in general, I do prefer Ghidra.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com