If larger or more powerful groups want to impose their will on smaller ones, they can go ahead and unilaterally do that, and own their behavior. Doing it "democratically" is just victim blaming.
If larger or more powerful groups want to impose their will on smaller ones, they can go ahead and unilaterally do that, and own their behavior. Doing it "democratically" is just victim blaming.
A global political voting system can only be used for evil, so why would you want it?
What would even be the point of democracy once privacy is gone and with it free speech?
I think the closest real world model would be China, where the government gives you a "happy shiny society member" score for how little you ever dissent and how well you can recite propaganda. ...and of course if you ask the CCP they will tell you that the will of the people is absolutely being done, and the ID-powered surveillance is just helping ; )
What's your ID by the way? Will you tell me? Would you?