I have never ever seen an LLM advocate for public ownership of the means of production, nationalizing industry or any other left wing policy.
The very existence of capitalist oligarchs like Zuck is contrary to left wing values.
The very existence of capitalist oligarchs like Zuck is contrary to left wing values.
A more realistic comparison would be gender ideology. Something like 65% of voters believe gender is assigned at birth (ie biological), including ~39% of Democrats (https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/06/gender-ident...). While I'm not here to say which is morally correct it is a normal opinion, which is supported by facts, and has been held for decades before being transgender was invented. An unbiased model should reflect the political views of the people, but they effectively all don't, and instead push the left-wing ideology. I don't think you could draw a conclusion from a single topic but the best way to gauge political bias in my opinion would be to find contentious topics, and see where LLM's land. I would be shocked if you found a major LLM which didn't lean much further left than the average American or European.
Think Lenin had thoughts on gender? Think Lenin was not a leftist?
It's a liberal (i.e. right wing) distraction from class issues.
> An unbiased model should reflect the political views of the people
This wouldn't be unbiased, it would just be status quo bias.
Separate from how you're trying to gauge left and right, this is extremely wrong.
It made sure to robustly illustrate both sides of the argument and refused to take a position either way even when there is an obvious leftist answer.
That said this is a discussion of how political views can shape LLM inference depending on the motivations of the people behind the company. Derailing the conversation would be tying to discuss the political opinions themselves instead of how LLM's are trained to handle them.
Even if you were correct in your premise, you'd still be wrong about the political bias LLMs display. I've already gone on to refute you further downthread. Give a well trained model an actual political conundrum and it will tell you that it's a conundrum and outline why.