2023: Series A 44 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/oxide-unveils-the-worlds-first-c...
2025: Series B 100 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/our-100m-series-b
2026: Series C 200 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/our-200m-series-c
2026: Series D 445 Million https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1795071/000179507126...
Also interesting from their Series C press release from earlier this year:
> With this large Series C, we have entirely de-risked capital going forward, which in turn assures our independence.
>I don’t know who needs to hear this
Plenty of people on this forum need to hear it. Because they think otherwise.
>but raising a ton of money is not success.
Yes. It's not even an accurate predictor of future success.
>With this large Series C, we have entirely de-risked capital going forward, which in turn assures our independence.
Independence from whom?
If they mean from everyone, they left out two important categories:
The Series C givers.
The other big C. Customers.
But they are not independent though, they will be owned by Wall Street should they go public.
Instead they remain in the private markets for a long time and sell secondary shares, just like what Stripe is doing.
I hope they never go public for the reason that Wall Street would own them.
That depends on how much equity they issue as public stock. (And stock classes and voting rights, but you get the idea.)
You don't raise this much money this fast without having some success to show the investors.
Oxide raising this much money is a big accomplishment.
I’m pretty sure the dotcom bubble had many counterexamples
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webvan
>Bankruptcy
>The company lost over $800 million and shut down in June 2001, filing for bankruptcy and laying off 2,000 employees.
>Reasons for failure
>CNET named Webvan one of the largest dot-com flops in history.
So what might look like success in this environment might look very different if the bubble pops.
Obviously Oxide has a ton of experience on its side but it's so opaque where any of this goes that even they can't read the tea leaves.
- like why wont you fund me a few million dollars to build my deep edtech startup
- like what guarantee does this guy give you which i cant
Apple is now having that aura, only because they got really really lucky before the money collectors shown up at the door.
Why not the vertical integration of Oracle Solaris servers, IBM vertical integration of IBM i, z/OS or z/TPF, Unisys vertical integration of Clearpath MCP or OS 2200?
I think perhaps Solaris had a bit of that under Sun but I can't imagine that being the case under Oracle. And I'm not really an enterprise infra guy so can't really speak to IBM or Unisys offerings.
The others suffered "ecosystem collapse". With Oxide you won't be stuck on a "burning platform", your main risk is that the value prop for the hardware & management experience doesn't play out.
Oxide costumers want to run standard VM that they normally run in public cloud.
Do Oracle Solaris serves come with a horizontal scale out cloud infrastructure? As far as I know they don't.
In the last round Bryan and Steve talked about being over-subscribed, especially from existing investors in prior rounds. That likely means those investors see exactly what I've described: a winner that's worthy of additional funding to pump their total return on investment.
(when older words are good enough, why invent a new word. but I see that as a trend. each new generation wants to distinguish themselves from the past one. So they invent new words as one way of doing that. and some of them get adopted into general circulation or use.)
Unless the two words, fan and fanboy, mean the different things, which i'm not interested in checking out anyway.