Hacker News Reader

Is someone really "guilty" of breaking an unjust law?

No.

An unjust law is no law at all

Agreed. So, in this case, a "pardon", now that I think about it, isn't exactly the right thing, in a sense. I mean, it's a nice token gesture, but it still implies that a law was actually broken. An apology for being victimized by a non-law would be more appropriate.

Interesting point. At first I was gonna say semantics, but in this case it matters. Guess they need to phrase it better when they start quashing the convictions.

As far as I know, no one has been pardoned for freeing slaves, either.

Very importantly slaves were allowed to be freed, by a court of law in the UK.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somersetts_Case

Guilty of breaking the law of the time? Semantics? Guess you could say "he broke a law. There shouldn't have been such a law, but unfortunately it was there, and he broke it."