Tropicana abandons new packaging; Twitter is the new focus group medium.
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Why would I want to follow Nike or even BMW?
P.S. Perhaps I'm just an 'untwittery type' - I find it hard to believe people actually use Twitter, period. I've tried and my response to 99% of tweets has always been "why would I care?" - if you're into assembling random facts about lives of strangers, just watching them in a cafe or on a busy town square is way more fun.
Now wouldn't that be considered a win for PepsiCo?
It kinda reminds me of how when facebook changes its interface, people bitch and moan, for about a month, and then, they kinda just forget what it was like before.
This thing with tropicana just sounds like people resisting change, for tradition's sake, rather than evaluating the new thing on its own merits.
A focus group seems like an artificial channel; you can't possibly hear what 100k people are saying about your product, so you pick 200 and you hope it's a random sample. But you can read what 100k people are writing, with good enough algorithms, so it'll be easier to gauge the Twitter zeitgeist on topics (like the election), if there is a zeitgeist at all. Gave a thousand samples out in a city and no one comments? That might be a interesting result in and of itself.
I'm left with two questions:
First, why would Tropicana choose to change their existing strong brand to this, rather than launching this as a side-brand under a new name and testing the market? To my limited knowledge, there are probably the strongest brand in orange juice in the US. I don't see why they would take this risk.
Second, it sounds like many people here and elsewhere actively like the new look. Others, such as me, do not. I have to presume that I'm in the minority, otherwise the consumer resistance would have turned up during Tropicana's user testing. Any ideas on why what underlies the divide between the presumed majority who like the new design and the curmedgeonly minority such as myself?