Meet the World’s Cheapest Venture Capitalist
wired.com
wired.com
As for WIRED, the journalistic quality has been going downhill for years. I stopped my subscription back in 2004.
I think this is great. Many ideas suffer from lack of publicity and not lack of usefulness. His own Pinboard took a long time to get noticed and to become the sensation it is. I offered to contribute $20 per startup, but I am sure that he is already overwhelmed with support.
Kickstarter meets angel.co
If you put money in the company, it's completely through standardized docs that say it is uncapped convertible debt.
So you can create rolling syndicates of people that each contribute $50 or $250 or $1250 dollars.
This is done publicly, and is a way for angels to signal mild interest in a company in a public way.
Conversion should not be triggered by an investment under $50K, to prevent the argument that the early investors bought equity at the same price as YC.
It makes the market for equity in startups a little more efficient.
Aren't we supposed to make a great and compelling product that makes each one of our customers pay us this $37. Why do we even need to do do all this rolling syndicated thingy?
Investment from anybody is a pain that is worth taking if you are getting a large amount in return. For the smaller amounts, working with customers is better on the pain-return axis.
KISS
1. He knows what he's doing. Only a fool would actually make this crazy idea so public.
2. $37 is nothing and he accepts it publicly so let's keep those "it's cheap, it's a spam, it's a joke, it's crap" comments to ourselves :)
3. It's not a speculative offer: at least, not after it's got so much public coverage and someone will be snooping around to see if he keeps his word. So $37 for focused publicity is pretty good.
4. In fact, he's doing a good thing. Most startups need nothing but exposure and connection with the right people. A few good men talking about the startup on their blogs gets a lot of good for the startup.
5. The part about convertible debt is going to be very debatable... and downright condemned but his investments in the form of time and contacts-expertise is going to be more than what a million-dollar VC would invest.
6. or in short, "it's not about the money."
But now, it seems everybody's taking it seriously? For example, the comments on that Wired article are dead serious.
So I don't know if I'm the one who's missing the point, or if everybody else is…
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/ha+ha+only+seriou...
But the selection process is the most important thing in this bet, and should not be simplified, he should spend as much time as HN people spend to select their batches.