You don’t seem to have read the comment you are replying to.
I think they understood it pretty well. What in it was worth any other reaction?
edit: I might add that anna's archive and sci-hub are good alternatives to the slopweb.
Nothing they said demonstrated any understanding of what they replied to. They simply restated their opinion with no reference to any of the points made in the comment they were ostensibly replying to.
The comment they’re replying to didn’t add anything new - it’s just the same old regurgitated ideas and has a lot of misconceptions. Almost exactly like LLM content. Taking the time to respond in detail would be a waste.
No actually it made a few specific historical analogies that I’ve never heard before and that absolutely could be responded to. The responder just chose not to.