Why don’t these programs use some form of edit distance? I’m sure that one could come up with a way to freeze the edit beyond some distance from the caret to reduce the potential for spooky UI action at a distance.
Why don’t these programs use some form of edit distance? I’m sure that one could come up with a way to freeze the edit beyond some distance from the caret to reduce the potential for spooky UI action at a distance.
Did you know about
It's a pretty old one at this point, but fantastic implementation
Look at any printed media from the last 100 years. Printing presses, books, magazines, newspaper.
A double space offers a visual clue where a 'mental breath' takes place.
edit: monospaced, not proportional.
I have, and it contradicts your point. The single space is the nearly universal standard in modern print media.
I don't really know about that. I think the point is to practice typing, and that may or may not reflect how you type in everyday life. For example, most people don't spend their time typing random words without numbers or punctuation :)
In any case, are you saying that if you correct a word during one of these tests, it simply should not count as a mistake? Because if not, then I don't see what the problem is again - typ.ing and most other sites note corrections, and distinguish between corrected and uncorrected mistakes.
If so, I guess we might just disagree on what the point of these exercises is.
See: https :// ibb.co / CKyxJNKR
One idea is letting you press enter to jump to the start of the next word and immediately resume.