“It doesn’t count because I don’t include it”? AGI doesn’t have a clear definition, there’s no consensus here, so that’s just not convincing to me.
I am not going to call something “intelligent” when it can’t sustain a basic conversation.
I am not going to call something “intelligent” when it can’t sustain a basic conversation.
Also, I would say SOTA LLM models can sustain a longer, more intelligent conversation than most people. Just in context length alone, they can keep track of more context than humans. But they're nowhere near as efficient the human brain, or the attention to quickly connect and find decades worth of memory like us.