LLMs are read only.
A developer would be the one using the LLM to evaluate page response text and scraping what they need.
LLMs cannot “crawl pages” or “scrape” or do anything - it’s an offline archive with a few convenience methods.
A developer would be the one using the LLM to evaluate page response text and scraping what they need.
LLMs cannot “crawl pages” or “scrape” or do anything - it’s an offline archive with a few convenience methods.
Being a bit needlessly pedantic here. I think it's well understood in these circles that such models are being driven by agents, which absolutely can crawl and scrape. The only thing a human needs to do is write rules for the agent to follow.
It’s also not true.
An LLM cannot visit the internet at all.
There is no “agent” - that is a marketing term. It’s software and LLM that’s it.
Wouldn’t matter in court anyway or anywhere you put it to the test even if you called it bits.
Point is dodging accountability by saying some “AI did it” when it’s not reflective of reality.
LLMs are read only and have no access to the internet :)