Non-Disclosure Agreements are for young losers, not old winners
behindtheclock.timmyontime.com
behindtheclock.timmyontime.com
I laughed because I was sure she was kidding. Turns out she wasn't. I politely declined her offer and walked out the door. She told me I'm making the biggest mistake of my life. I probably spent the next two months being in such a paranoid state that I was pretty much useless as a contributor. It turns out she never did follow through on her threats. But I learned then that even someone with the worst of intentions can't necessarily take someone else's idea and turn it into a reality. That's when I started to relax a bit when it comes to NDAs. But, that said, I still ask contractor programmers to sign them but what I ask them to sign is so amazingly simple that it's more an agreement to respect each other's ideas.
Don't suppose you want to post her name so the rest of us can avoid her? :)
I'm confused. Doesn't that mean she was kidding? Or at least, how does her making false threats reinforce your paranoia?
What an awful person - she'll get what's coming eventually.
* That you have almost no ability to enforce contracts as an early-stage business, because lawsuits are too expensive.
* That actual lawsuits take years to resolve, usually longer than the expected lifetime of your company.
* That it is very easy to strangle business opportunities by letting them get tied up in legal negotiations.
* That in the end, there is usually a lot less value in the information you're trying to protect than you think there is.
This statement is too broad to be useful. While entrepreneurs should be comfortable assessing and managing risk, it's invalid to say that entrepreneur = risk-taker, therefore they should take risk X. There are situations in which NDAs are useful to entrepreneurs and the risk of ignoring them doesn't prove your entrepreneurship, just your ignorance.
When you're young, inexperienced, and (most importantly) have a limited business network it is much harder to execute on an idea. A successful older person has a trusted network that they can approach with their ideas, and therefore worry less about NDAs. Younger people -- and those with less experience -- are often cold contacting angels, or setting up meetings with potential investors they have had very short business relationships with. The potential investor probably won't steal their amazing idea, but the process of starting up is much more difficult and the time cycle of idea to launch could be significantly longer for this group of people than those with experience, which could explain the paranoia.
I'd expect those with a smaller, less "powerful" network to more often ask for NDAs on new ventures, regardless of age.
This is old news:
Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats. [Howard H. Aiken, as quoted in Portraits in Silicon (1987) by Robert Slater] [from wikiquote]
Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration. [Thomas Edison, spoken statement (c. 1903); published in Harper's Monthly (September 1932)] [from wikiquote]
Actually, startup ideas are not million dollar ideas, and here's an experiment you can try to prove it: just try to sell one. Nothing evolves faster than markets. The fact that there's no market for startup ideas suggests there's no demand. Which means, in the narrow sense of the word, that startup ideas are worthless. [Paul Graham, http://www.paulgraham.com/ideas.html]
NDAs may have uses in established companies with very specific trade secrets that established competitors would be able to use right away (see, e.g., http://www.mbay.net/~heuer/Spystory/Industry.htm -- though that points out that some people are willing to risk criminal indictments, not just civil suits...). They're not worth the trouble for your cool idea to, say, monitor eBay auctions via Twitter and bid by tweet. Uh-oh, I guess we're not in stealth mode any more, Toto. ;-)
However, there is one case when NDAs aren't stupid: when you're applying for a patent. If it ever comes to litigation, you have to be able to show you made an effort to keep your invention secret.
WTF.
I would quite happily sign - once I had struck through or amended the clauses I didn't like. That used to confuse them occasionally, but they never argued.
God I feel old.
Oh and btw you are really asking for trouble with that kind of title ;)