Lem's focus seems to be on being an "emacs" in and for Common Lisp. Lem throws away any attempts at compatibility with GNU Emacs.
This is trying to be compatible with GNU Emacs.
This is trying to be compatible with GNU Emacs.
That depends on what you mean by compatibility.
Keybindings and conventions and the like are basically the same.
I'm not actually convinced at this point on the value of a lot of the extant elisp out there.
Emacs Lisp...
> I'm not actually convinced at this point on the value of a lot of the extant elisp out there.
I agree but lots of people probably don't.