They’re not bots they are ai skeptics who want to prove that ai isn’t actually productive we all just think it is
It's a simple question that seems to make AI cheerleaders really mad.
"How are you measuring improvement."
I use AI for coding every day and see it fail all the time, I'm a seasoned developer and early tech adopter just like everyone else on HN. I'm still very skeptical because of how often these systems just miss. It's gambler's ruin on a very large scale, we remember the hits and forget the misses.
I don't expect AI to be perfect. Are people perfect? I leave room for corrections, but at this point they are usually minor and acceptable.