It is insane how many times I see this false analogy repeated on HN over and over (analogy of a deterministic-by-design calculator device (or a compiler, etc.) and a non-deterministic-by-design LLM software).
Nothing is stopping LLMs to be more deterministic/correct over time.
Also you yourself is nondeterministic :)
All people are. That is how automation appeared to begin with - to provide deterministic behavior.
So what's stopping "non deterministic" AIs from doing the same, at faster/larger scale? :)
you clearly don't know how transistors work, which is ironic because it's a thread in hackernews about LLMs and mathematics