This all seems like a way to try to avoid taking responsibility for the model’s actions. Someone puts the tools in place, someone provides the instruction and, sometimes, someone decides not to monitor the model’s output.
This all seems like a way to try to avoid taking responsibility for the model’s actions. Someone puts the tools in place, someone provides the instruction and, sometimes, someone decides not to monitor the model’s output.
Sure. It's a good idea.
People were saying "Don't connect the AI to the internet" and "Keep the AI in a box, simple" and "We don't believe Eliezer Yudkowsky when he says he roleplayed as an AI and convinced people to let him out of the box" for, what, a decade?
Unfortunately, people keep giving dangerous tools to LLMs they're unable to predict.
We should do something about that.
Unfortunately, one of the people doing this is the commander-in-chief of the US armed forces, while another is the world's first (paper) trillionaire. I'm a little despondent about the chances of, to riff on a previous campaign chant, "lock 'em up", but if you can pull this off, go for it.