Hacker News Reader

Comment by consumer451 | Hacker News Reader

I am getting way too old for this. No more "both sides." Look at the data. If you want a balanced budget, there is one party to avoid.

View on HN

Since Bill Clinton and Lyndon B Johnson were the only two presidents to see a balanced budget I can guess which party you mean.

Sorry for misspeaking. What I should have said is that "If you want anything approaching a balanced budget in modern times..."

The facts are that surpluses were routine before the 1960s, under both parties. Since then, not so much.

1998 was the first year the United States government recorded a budget surplus since 1969 [0] (Clinton with a GOP Congress).

Since 1981, the deficit deepened under Republican administrations and shrank under Democratic ones [1]

That aligned with the creation of a right-specific media system where "Republicans don't fight Republicans" - so there can never be any internal accountability.

[0] https://clintonwhitehouse3.archives.gov/WH/New/html/19981028...

[1] https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-us-deficit-gr...

I don't feel like I "both sides"ed it that much, but I guess reasonable minds can disagree. But: neither party has balanced the federal budget, or even made (sane) noises about doing so, since the Democrats in the 90s. I haven't heard much about it from Democrats this election cycle -- perhaps reasonably so since there are much more critical issues at the moment.

If you look at the record, republicans out match democrats 3 to 1 for balanced budget years.

But it doesn’t matter. Those historical parties have nothing in common with their namesake parties today.

The last Republican to balance the budget was Eisenhower. Yeah, Clinton is pretty old today too, but almost no one alive today was of voting age during the Eisenhower administration.

So, I agree with your conclusion.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

Sorry, I was not aiming that directly at you, more like an old man yelling at clouds. I kinda give up on all of this. Nobody wants to hear or debate actual policies in the public. Politics is now just an exercise in campism. Nobody plays that game better than the current party.

Yeah, it sucks. Thanks for clarifying :(

There hasn’t been a balanced budget for 25 years. Today’s parties aren’t the same.

What’s the point of one party balancing the budget if the next party just blows it up? That’s been the pattern since Clinton.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com