https://arxiv.org/html/2512.05311v1
It’s not mathematically possible to reliably discern human writing from llm writing.
> It is, it's disrespectful of the reader. Like others have said time and again across HN: why should I spend my time reading an article the "author" couldn't even spend their own time writing?
You are entitled to your opinion. As for me, I focus on the actual content and merits of the writing.
Wish I could use emojis on HN because this definitely warrants the nerd emoji. Bud, humans aren't machines. It might not be "mathematically possible" for an algorithm to discern the difference, but a human can absolutely detect the uncanny valley that is LLM writing.
> You are entitled to your opinion. As for me, I focus on the actual content and merits of the writing.
You're entitled to waste your time if it pleases you.
I’d shave off my head if you or any other human can reliably discern LLM vs human in a proper controlled test.