> Sam is a proven sociopath, compulsive liar and manipulator. I have absolutely 0 issues believing he'd kill or rape someone, even a family member.
You are heavily biased, and that makes you construct evidence in your head, that makes it more believable to you that he did what you already are convinced of that he did.
You start with, is there the possibility they are covering for their billionaire son? Sure.
But why, and how would they benefit from that? They all have their own things going and don’t need their brother’s /son’s money.
I also doubt Sam and Annie were indifferent to their parents. She’s the only daughter, mothers are usually very protective of younger kids who are the minority gender in the household, especially in a household full of boys.
They also supported her financially way past maturity, just like they supported their sons. If she was a nuisance, or even a risk, why not just make a hard cut when she’s old enough to live on her own and isolate her?
If you accept sexual abuse in your household for one single kid specifically, isn’t it very unusual to offer that level of support to someone you seem to hate and/or really don’t care for their mental and physical health as a parent?
These are educated people, no methheads.
Then you add another link to the chain and say, well, if they don’t do it on purpose, then they must be in denial he did it.
If it’s not that either, well then the mental health issues must be from being raped as a child.
I am confident you have a bunch more of what you think are valid arguments, but those will also not be anchored in reality.
You’re free to believe whatever you want, even that jet fuel doesn’t melt steel beams. Just doesn’t mean it’s true.
Think for a second, how often is the simple answer the right one, and how many times were the conspiracy theorists right?