this feels very thought-crimey to me, but I think I'd have to actually see that chats to really decide. Like is she making plans/asking for advice? is she just talking about her feelings exactly as if it's a diary?
> The arrest report states that on Sept. 26 at approximately 5:10 a.m., Heller reportedly wrote, "I'm going to shoot up the sheriff's right the [expletive] now." The following day, at approximately 1:07 a.m., she was accused of posting, "This is 100% last chance I'm done. I got a new [expletive] gun today. [Expletive] you."
[1] https://www.gulfcoastnewsnow.com/article/florida-woman-arres...
I suppose a "reasonable person" should now conclude that expletives are only part of speech with a reasonable expectation of privacy. /s
[fwiw if I were a human flagged to review these texts, I'd likely report them. My problem is with building huge systems marketed as almost a tool for thought, and then exposing these almost-thoughts for unlimited copyright case retention, for human threat review, and god knows what else.]
Basically, under this interpretation, any personal note you store in the servers of a company could qualify, even if you didn't ever imagine someone would read and as such you couldn't have thought about it as a threat