> I don't think they're making it better, that's the whole debate.
How not? Their contribution is around 300k+ lives saved.
> That's just an example, referring to the Rohingya genocide or the Palestinian genocide, both of which have been more than facilitated by tech companies.
Do you think EA's would advocate for this? Or you suggest that some EA's merely working for a company that does this is already making them so evil and irredeemable?
> for example, slavery abolition or women's right to vote in the Global North was not achieved by advocating to work for plantation owners and then giving away money to charity
Do you then think that the only way to make change in society is to create revolutions and protests? Anyone who tries to help in any other way is not useful?