The people in here sticking to their dogma has motivated me to start building out tests for a lot of this stuff. I spent a chunk of my day today testing the MR tool today.

* vanilla claude with our MCPs + a decent prompt (like a paragraph tops) * an agent that was previously made, much more concise skills * the mr tool this IC created

The MR tool didn't even catch some of the stuff in our domain that the others caught and it took 45minutes, cost $20 vs 4mins for vanilla (<$1) and 7mins for the agent ($3ish)

And yeah, code-reviews are supposed to be by humans, but we have a ton of reviews come in where there's a ton of low hanging fruit. This tool is meant to be a gate between getting an actual human code review and some of the slop coming in these days.

I'll go through a bunch more MR reviews, see how things go. But I've gotta start figuring out how to test the documentation, decision docs, and other plugins/skills.