If you read all the replies of the OP you would know that They tried to make progress with fable and did not get further, so at the moment the only person in the field is OpenAI. And secondly moving on to the next solution if the last one did not work means very different things, SWEs have dev tools to do this OpenAI is closed source and gives them nothing to move on with.

Also there is a larger epistemic problem with the argument to "using AI to meet the goal or solution", which is that the goal is to mentor and train future mathematicians to advance the field.

There is a similar issue in software engineering too: if no one hires junior engineers because AI can do all the work then the upstream pipeline of engineers qualified to work on difficult architectural problems would dry up.

This importance of this is being felt by mathematicians more acutely because the field will collapse quickly if people refuse to join it.