I would argue that "Interpretable from a human perspective" is a form of anthropocentrism, which is basically the root of both anthropomorphism and anthropodenial. For sure it's fascinating to think from a human perspective from time to time.
On the other hand, putting humans at the center of the universe is a really old habit with a long track record of getting in the way of science. It's often more useful to regard every organism (or possibly entity) in their own environment, sensory abilities, and incentives, and see how their behaviour is evolutionarily and/or heuristically formed.
You'd be surprised how quickly the differences in perception and neural processing can bite you in the lab. (For instance: try observing zebrafish in real time. See if you manage to decide whether they were responding to your intervention; or if they got there-and-back while you blinked, and maybe now they're already pursuing some other goal. )