> The trouble with guessing who’s calling is that you can’t anticipate every caller. Pendulum’s hard-coded check is fragile: it covers only one name, and relies on an exact call stack that Pendulum doesn’t control.
Edit: it looks like the later parts of the article show a lot of LLM tells, but not the beginning. I've been seeing this pop up more and more lately...
By the end of that paragraph thereafter I started skimming as the rest turned blatantly LLM.
I should have caught the emdash in the first code block in "Who else is calling" though...
You didn't stop reading after "The hack itself is on its way out, but the design behind it still matters for your code"? I did.
I have a suspicion that in these cases, either people are purposefully copyediting only the very beginning, or the very beginning has most of the prompt and the rest is pure extension.
IMO: writing ~= thinking and if you let a clanker write for you then you'll forget how to think properly, so no one should be doing it.
That's what I mean by "the very beginning has most of the prompt" :)