That's loaded with ambiguous qualifiers. Anybody could say that about pretty much any revolutionary technology. Unless you have a convincing argument for how there's literally only one way for it to go right, it's an unfalsifiable claim.
The atomic bomb did, of course, but only down one primary path: a human firing them off
I’d argue the internet is probably the closest, as the doomsday branches it (global connection and instant worldwide communication) might lead down are much more complex and numerous.
And under a long enough time horizon, you could just as well argue that pretty much every scientific advancement has contributed to the development of modern AI. Does it count as AI doom if a century from now humans just start a plain old World War N with barely-intelligent killer robots?