You are still writing in generalities. You need to actually pick a prominent study and state how it specifically mistakes correlation for causation. Just saying “oh all the existing science is wrong” doesn’t advance your argument. You’re assuming the reader knows what you’re talking about.

I don’t have any vested interest in upholding those studies, for all I know you might be entirely right. But if they’re the only studies out right now, the onus is on you, as a minority dissenter, to say specifically why they’re wrong. To just handwave it away is to undercut your own position because it makes you look like a crank who is just casually attacking the state of the field. And in the context of a forum such as this, it’s very off-putting, obnoxious behavior.

You’d get no pushback if you actually substantiated your points rather than tossing around general criticisms.