It reads as an example of English writing that was once considered "proper". The point I see is that it shows how this complaint about AI writing is history rhyming with itself again.
It's the same tired game we play, as a society, any time a new writing style enters the mainstream. That game goes back to at least Shakespeare's era, where our illustrious bard was called out for his tendency to make up words ("fashionable" being, I believe, an actual example of this?)
That being said, natural language has inherent entropy that LLMs paper over with temperature and random sampling.
That makes sense to me - the stuff that had me fooled was probably as much work as just writing it would have been.
You can get an LLM to write anything any way you want. You can also get yourself to write anything any way you want. I don't care about LLMs for writing, but I do care that people recognize vacuous and confusing writing when they see it.